KMU receivesTop Evaluation at the Second BK21 (Brain Korea 21) Assessment
- 12.09.28 / 최규찬
| Category | Business Name | Director | Grade |
| Core and Basics | Functional and Micro Magnetic Research Team |
Nano Electro Physics Department Professor Kim, Chul-sung |
Very excellent |
| Core Humanities & Social Research |
U-business Service Model &Platform Research Team |
Management Information Department Professor Park, Su-hyeon |
Very excellent |
| Core Humanities & Social Research Design image |
Ubiquitous Smart Space Designer Foster Team |
Architecture Professor Kim, Yong-sung |
Excellent |
The second step of BK21’sactivity (World Class University Foster Project) was a national research development business hosted by the National Science & Technology Commission and the Ministry of Education, Science and Technology, and was graded based on each team's achievement for six years(from March 1, 2006 to February 29, 2012).
This grade was decided upon after experts’ examination and deliberation of the BK21 steering committee’s approval. It also evaluates the achievement of each business team based on the goals given by the government. Major achievements, such as job and thesis, increase and decrease in quality during the 6 years and the qualitative excellence of each representative sample were reflected in theexamination.
|
KMU receivesTop Evaluation at the Second BK21 (Brain Korea 21) Assessment |
|||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
2012-09-28
53457
Kookmin University’s BK21 team (Functional Ultra-minute Magnetism Research Team) received top evaluation at the 2012 second BK21 projects assessment, announced on September 15.
This grade was decided upon after experts’ examination and deliberation of the BK21 steering committee’s approval. It also evaluates the achievement of each business team based on the goals given by the government. Major achievements, such as job and thesis, increase and decrease in quality during the 6 years and the qualitative excellence of each representative sample were reflected in theexamination. |
|||||||||||||||||||
